This site is under construction and will go live in 2024.

Animal Ethics and Veganism

Preface

Meta, Sharing, Companion Videos, etc.

Companion Videos

Short Vertical:
60 Seconds

Share this Briefing
Briefing Meta
Meme
Hunger HD Meme

Summary

Broad Summary of the Briefing

Over 75% of the world’s soy and grain used for food, such as corn and oats, is fed to farmed animals.

However, research shows that if we feed these crops, or similar ones grown on the same land, directly to humans, we could feed 3.5 billion more people globally, and 400 million more just in the United States.

This is because of the extreme inefficiencies of having an animal convert feed into human food. It takes on average 24 calories of animal feed to produce one calorie of human food. This because most of the calories fed to an animal are expended for daily living, not to make flesh, dairy, or eggs.

Hence, transitioning towards a plant-based food economy could have significant advantages in terms of feeding the world and mitigating world hunger and starvation.

Note: Citations for the facts presented above can be found in the body of the briefing.

Context

Places this topic in its larger context.

Globally, over 9 million people including 3 million children die from starvation every year.(UN World Food Program1 2)

Globally, over 800 million individuals, including 300 million children, grapple with hunger and malnutrition on a daily basis.(UN World Food Program3)

A rising human population from 8 billion in 2022 to a projected 10 billion in 2058 should require at least a proportionate 25% increase in food production.(United Nations4)

While we do produce enough to feed everyone, hunger and starvation are complex problems involving logistics, food waste, war, extreme weather, poverty, food production systems, and pandemics (Bloomberg Analysis 5; UN World Food Program6)

Details

Poor logistics prevents food from getting to those in need in a timely manner.

Food Waste: food gets spoiled or discarded, reducing what’s available for consumption.

War disrupts production, displaces people from food sources, and it can also create trade blockages.

Extreme weather such as droughts, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes, exacerbated by climate change, these devastate crops and reduce harvests.

Poverty limits people’s ability to afford food, even when it’s available.

Pandemics disrupt food production and supply chains, and strains social support systems.

Food production systems are where the difference in efficiency between plant-based food production and animal agriculture plays out, and is the focus of this briefing.

Key Points

Think of this section as the heart of the briefing.

Multiple studies show that we can feed far more people on a plant-based, vegan diet.

Meme

“The calories that are lost by feeding cereals to animals, instead of using them directly as human food, could theoretically feed an extra 3.5 billion people.”(a research report from the United Nations Environment Program, the World Bank, and others, and signed by 58 nations (UNEP IAASTD report7)

  • Don’t let the word theoretically throw you—of course it’s theoretical because it would be impossible to conduct an experiment to test this. The conclusion is based on modeling and analysis.
caption

“If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million.” (an analysis by a Cornell University ecologist David Pimentel8)

Hunger HD Meme

“Given the current mix of crop uses, growing food exclusively for direct human consumption could, in principle, increase available food calories by as much as 70%, which could feed an additional 4 billion people.”( Environmental Research Letters9)

Note: The population of the United States was approximately 335 million as of November 30, 2023. (Census Bureau10)

“Replacing all animal-based items with plant-based replacement diets can produce up to 20 times more nutritionally similar food on the same amount of land”(PNAS, by two environmental scientists, a physicist, and a molecular biologist11)

Over 75% of the world’s grains and soy used for food are fed to animals.

According to the UN’s 2022 Food Outlook report, approximately 75% of the world’s coarse grains used for food are fed to animals. Coarse grains include corn, oats, barley, sorghum, millet, and rye.12

According to a 2020 report compiled by the Our World in Data group from the UN and other sources, “more than three-quarters (77%) of global soy is fed to livestock for meat and dairy production.” 13

Most of the grains and soy used for animal feed could provide good nutrition to humans.

Coarse grains are not just edible by humans, but are also contain nutrients important for maintaining human health (A PubMed Study14)

Field corn (as opposed to sweet corn) is sometimes mistakenly thought of as used only for animal feed, yet can provide human nutrition. Maize, which is essentially field corn, is eaten by humans in several cultures. (Michigan State Extension15; New York Academy of Sciences16 )

The soybeans used for animal feed are largely the same as those used for human consumption, but are processed differently.(IntechOpen report17)

The reason we can feed far more on a vegan diet is because animal agriculture is extremely inefficient.

Animal agriculture is so inefficient because most of the feed calories consumed by an animal go toward energy for daily living. Also, some energy is expended to produce body parts that are not consumed.(Applied Animal Nutrition Journal18)

Animal agriculture uses 83% of global farmland while producing only 18% of total calories and 37% of calories from protein. This according to a 2018 J Poor led study from Oxford which has been called “the most comprehensive analysis to date of the damage farming does to the planet,” having examined 38,700 farms in 119 countries representing 90% of the world’s protein and calorie consumption. (The Guardian19; “Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers”, published in Science Magazine20)

  • The logical converse of this startling statistic is that 17% of farmland is used to grow food for human consumption, yet produces 82% of total calories and 63% of calories from protein.

Calorie conversion: It takes on average 24 calories of plant feed to produce one calorie of food from animals. (World Resources Institute, “Creating a Sustainable Food Future”21)

Feed conversion: It takes on average 7 pounds of feed to produce one pound of food made from animal flesh and secretions.

  • Even with the dismal feed conversion ratio of 7 to 1, such a ratio understates the inefficiency because it “improperly compares the weight of a relatively wet output [meat, dairy, and eggs] to the weight of a relatively dry input [feed grains]”. (World Resources Institute, “Creating a Sustainable Food Future”22)

According to a University of Minnesota study, only 12% of crops fed to animals contribute to the human diet as meat and other animal products23

According to a 2018 study published in the journal Nature, if everyone in the world were to adopt a Western-style diet high in meat and dairy, it would require 4 Earths to provide enough pastureland and cropland to feed the livestock.24

Many countries export grain, or provide food for animals destined to be eaten by the more affluent, while their own children are starving or hungry.

Phillip Wollen, a  philanthropist and a former Vice-President of Citibank, said that “as I travel around the world I see poor countries sell their grain to the west while their own children die in their arms.” 25

“Tragically, some 80% of the world’s hungry children live in countries with actual food surpluses, much of which is in the form of feed fed to animals which will be consumed by only the well-to-do consumers.”(Jeremy Rifkin, noted author of 23 books on the impact of global changes26)

“82% of the world’s starving children live in countries where food is fed to animals that are then killed and eaten by more well-off individuals in developed countries like the US, UK, and in Europe.” (Dr. Richard Oppenlander, 2012 Book27)

It seems almost criminal that starving and hungry people, be they children or adults, do not have access to food grown locally—food that is instead used to support the animal agriculture industry.

Counterclaims

Responses to some “yes but..” retorts.

Claim: We already produce enough food to feed everyone—hunger and starvation are logistical and food waste problems.

Yes, we are producing enough to feed everyone.(Bloomberg Analysis)28

Logistics and food waste do indeed contribute to hunger and starvation problems, as do war, extreme weather, extreme poverty, and pandemics.(UN World Food Program)29

Still, it seems naïve the think that the ability to feed an additional 3.5 billion globally and an additional 400 million in the United States would not help with the problem because some of that additional food would likely reach the hungry and starving. (United Nations Environment Program30; an analysis by a Cornell University ecologist David Pimentel31)

A rising human population from 8 billion in 2022 to a projected 10 billion in 2058 should require at least a proportionate 25% increase in food production, suggesting we might not be able to feed everyone forever(United Nations32)

“The benefits of replacing animal-based food with plant-based food are well above the expected benefits of eliminating all supply chain food waste [which includes logistics], according to an analysis of opportunity costs.”(a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by two environmental scientists, a physicist, and a molecular biologist33)

There will likely be less waste with plant-based foods, particularly grains and nuts and seeds, because they can be stored longer before spoilage compared to meat, dairy, and eggs, and refrigeration is less important.

Claim: “86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans.”

A Sacred Cow article misquoted a Science Direct analysis when it said that “86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans.”34

The Science Direct analysis instead says “86% is made of materials that are currently not eaten by humans,” not materials that humans cannot eat.35

  • The distinction between materials that are “not eaten by humans” and those that are inherently “inedible” is important in understanding the implications of the 86% figure. If the calculation were based on the inherent edibility of feed materials, the percentage of non-edible feed could differ significantly from the 86% figure.

Even the misquoted Science Direct analysis acknowledges the inefficiency of feed conversion in saying “very low efficiencies in terms of overall feed input can be found in extensive grazing ruminant systems due not only to low productivity but also to low nutritional density of feed.(Ibid.)”

The Science Direct analysis is based on feed weight, not calories(Ibid.)

  • If the analysis was by calories the 86% figure would be considerably lower as the non-edible portion of animal feed is typically composed of materials such as crop residues, food waste, and by-products from food processing, which are generally lower in caloric content compared to edible feed sources such as grains and legumes.

This 86% claim, even if true, would not change the fact that over 75% of the world’s grains and soy used for food are fed to animals, as shown above.

This 86% claim, even if true, would not change the research reported above showing that with plant-based foods we could feed an additional 3.5 billion globally and another 400 million in the US, and that livestock are highly inefficient at converting feed into meat.

This 86% claim, even if true, fails to consider that much of the land used to grow silage and fodder crops (such as corn, barley, and alfalfa) for feed could also be used to grow crops for human consumption.36

This 86% claim, even if true, would not change the research referenced above, showing that it takes on average 24 calories of plant feed to produce one calorie of food from animals.

Claim: Increased grazing, particularly holistic, regenerative grazing, can help with the problem because grazed animals do not require feed.

We simply don’t have enough land—the US has enough pasture to support only 27% of the current beef production.” (Environmental Research Letters 2018 37 )

Grazed animals are often fed grains even while grazing and then moved to a feedlot to be fed grains for 4 to 6 months of their 18-month (Food Transparency Project, 202038) existence before being slaughtered.(the North American Meat Institute, 2015)39

Claim: As there are starving people, we should put them first over non-human animals.

We address this related tangential claim here because it is sometimes posited as a general objection to veganism, not an objection to the premise of this briefing.

As we have documented in this briefing, you can feed far more with a plant-based food economy, so this point is moot.

Even if you could not feed more people with plants, it’s possible to care about and act on more than one problem.

Claim: It would be impossible or difficult for people in some cultures to give up animal products because of a lack of alternatives.

We address this related tangential claim here because it is sometimes posited as a general objection to veganism, not an objection to the premise of this briefing.

This is true, but irrelevant to most of the people reading this who are not in a food desert and within easy reach of multiple grocery stores.

It would be disingenuous for someone to proclaim, for example, that because goat herders in Afghanistan can’t do it, they are not even going to consider it.

Supplementary Info

Additional information that may prove useful.

While Asia currently has the greatest number of undernourished (381 million), people, the report showed that the number in Africa is growing fast (250 million), followed by Latin America and the Caribbean (48 million).(United Nations40 )

On current trends, by 2030, Africa will be home to more than half of the world’s chronically hungry.”(United Nations, 2020 41)

Further Study

Sources helpful in providing a deeper understanding of the topic.

Related Briefings

None Yet

From Other Websites

The website A Well-Fed World provides research and analysis on how “a global shift towards plant-based foods more efficiently uses crops and natural resources to nourish people and cool the climate.”

Mic the Vegan’s YouTube video A Solution to World Hunger? provides “a look at some well documented and major inefficiencies in the global food distribution that are by driven by food choice plus how to fix them.”

A multi-discipline report with recommendations for agriculture titled The IAASTD Report—Agriculture at a Crossroads is the work of the United Nations Environment Program.

The article 10 Facts About Child Hunger in The World by theUN World Food Program, will give you a better understanding of the impacts of hunger on children.

A research article The Opportunity Cost of Animal Based Diets Exceeds All Food Losses explores the opportunity cost of animal agriculture, and as such, indirectly addresses hunger.

Advocacy Resources

Stuff that can help with outreach and advocacy.

Companion Videos

Short Vertical:
60 Seconds

Youtube

Instagram

Tiktok

Twitter X

Youtube

Instagram

Tiktok

Twitter X

How to use companion videos

You can view the from videos here or in the Preface Section. Videos may be posted on multiple platforms, so we have provided links here for you to share as allowed be each platform.

Social Sharing Image
Hunger Briefing Social Sharing Image
How to use the social sharing image

Whenever you share this briefing to Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms, this is the image that will be displayed with the post. Sharing can be done by copying the URL of the briefing, using the feature the near the top of this briefing in the Preface Section, or for your convenience, using the links below.

Facebook Cover Photo
How to use the Facebook cover photo

This image is properly sized to use as a Facebook cover photo. The text on the image is strategically positioned to properly show on mobile devices and not be blocked by the larger profile image, although this could possibly happen on some mobile devices.

To make this your Facebook cover photo, right click on the image and choose download or save as. Then proceed to Facebook and choose Edit Cover Photo then follow Facebook’s instructions to upload the photo.

Memes and Infographics
How to use Memes and Infographics

To sequence through all memes and infographics on this page, click on any image than use the arrow keys or the arrow buttons to show next and previous images.

To share a meme or infographic, right click on the image and choose download or save as. Then upload the image to the platform of choice.

Presentation Slides
Hunger-slides V7 by vBriefings

Full Canva Access to Slides

How to Use the Presentation Slides

You can view the slideshow full screen by clicking on the first link above.

To use Canva presenter mode, view the presenter notes, or download the slides as PowerPoint, login to Canva (the free account works) and follow the Full Canva Link provided above.

To copy this presentation to your own Canva project, use the Full Canva Link provided above, then select File->Make a Copy from the upper left. You can build your own unique presentation from multiple briefings by copying the presentation from each briefing and then building another presentation from the copied presentations.

Flash Cards
Study Cards
in Order
Study Cards
Randomly
Export to
CSV File
How to Use the Flash Cards

Flash cards are here to help you commit important facts and concepts in this briefing to memory.

You can study the flash cards in order or randomly by using the Study Cards buttons above.

With the export button, your can export the flash cards in order to import them into other flash card platforms, such as Brainscape.

You can view all the cards at once by clicking the View Cards link below.

View Cards

Version:

V20240506A

  • What is the premise of the briefing at vbriefings.org/hunger?
    Moving toward a plant-based food economy will promote a more efficient food system better capable of feeding the world’s starving, hungry, and impoverished.
  • If you had to summarize the reason that veganism can mitigate world hunger and starvation, what might you say?
    Over 75% of the world’s soy and grain used for food, such as corn and oats, is fed to farmed animals.

    However, research shows that if we feed these crops, or similar ones grown on the same land, directly to humans, we could feed 3.5 billion more people globally, and 400 million more just in the United States.

    This is because of the extreme inefficiencies of having an animal convert feed into human food. It takes on average 24 calories to animal feed to produce 1 calorie of human food.

    And most of the calories feed to an animal are expended for daily living, not make flesh, dairy, or eggs.

    Hence, transitioning towards a plant-based food economy could have significant advantages in terms of feeding the world and mitigating world hunger and starvation.
  • How many people die from starvation every year, and how many of those are children?
    According to the UN, over 9 million people including 3 million children, die from starvation every year.
  • How many people face hunger and malnutrition, and how many of those are children?
    According to the UN, over 800 million, including 300 million children, grapple with hunger and malnutrition daily.
  • What is the global human population count (2022) ?
    8 billion. (UN)
  • When will the population reach 10 billion?
    2058 (UN)
  • We will need how much more food production to feed everyone in 2058?
    A rising human population from should require at least a proportionate 25% increase in food production by 2058 (United Nations)
  • Why are we not producing enough food to feed everyone?
    Trick question. We are producing enough to feed everyone. (Bloomberg Analysis)
  • What are 7 factors that contribute to world hunger and starvation?
    Logistics, food waste, war, extreme weather, poverty, food production systems, and pandemics.
  • What are the key points presented in the briefing that support the assertion that veganism can mitigate hunger and starvation?
    1. Multiple studies show that we can feed far more people on a plant-based, vegan diet.

    2. Over 75% of the world’s grains and soy used for food are fed to animals.

    3. Most of the grains and soy used for animal feed could provide good nutrition to humans.

    4. The reason we can feed far more on a vegan diet is because animal agriculture is extremely inefficient.

    5. According to two authors, most of the world’s hungry children live in countries that give food to animals destined to be eaten by the more affluent.
  • How many more people could we feed with the calories that are lost to feeding cereals (grains) to animals, according to an IAASTD report (2008)?
    3.5 Billion
  • Who authored and endorsed the IAASTD report referenced in the briefing?
    The UN Environment Program, the World Bank, and others authored the report. 58 nations signed off on the report.
  • The IAASTD report referenced in the briefing said we could “theoretically feed.” billions more. Why does the word “theoretically” not diminish the strength of the finding?
    The word “theoretically” just means the estimates are based on modeling. That has to be the case because it would be impossible to conduct an experiment to test the conclusions.
  • According to a report in Environmental Research Letters, how much could we increase production in calories by growing crops for direct human consumption?
    70%. The report also says we could feed an additional 4 billion people.
  • If we fed people the grain now fed to livestock just in the United States, now many people could we feed?
    Almost 800 million, according to a Cornell University Ecologist.
  • What is the population of the United States?
    335 million as of November 2023 (Census Bureau)
  • How can we “produce up to 20 times more nutritionally similar food on the same of amount of land?”
    by “replacing all animal-based items with plant-based replaced diets.” (a study by two environmental scientists, a physicist, and a molecular biologist)
  • What percentage of the world’s course grains and soy used for food are fed to animals?
    Over 75%
  • Name 6 coarse grains.
    Corn, oats, barley, sorghum, millet, and rye.
  • Are coarse grains edible by humans?
    Yes, and not only that, they are important for maintaining human health in various cultures, according to a study published in PubMed.
  • Is field corn used only for animal feed, as is widely believed?
    No, field corn (as opposed to sweet corn) can be eaten by humans and is in several cultures. It’s often call Maize.
  • What is the difference between maize and field corn?
    Although that are essentially the same botanically, “maize” usually refers to corn to be eaten by humans, while “field corn” refers to corn to be used as feed for animals.
  • What is the difference between soybeans fed to animals and those used for human consumption?
    Nothing, but they are processed differently.
  • Why can we feed vastly more people on a vegan diet?
    Because animal agriculture is extremely inefficient in converting feed into meat, dairy, and eggs.
  • Why is animal agriculture inefficient?
    Because most of the feed calories consumed by an animal go toward energy for daily living. Also, some energy is spent to produce body parts that are not consumed.
  • Why did The Guardian call the Joseph Poore Oxford Study of 2018 “the most comprehensive analysis to date of the damage farming does to the planet?”
    Because it examined 38,700 farms in 119 countries representing 90% of the world’s protein and calorie consumption.
  • What percentage of global farmland does animal agriculture use?
    83% (Joseph Poore Oxford Study 2018)
  • In using 83% of the global farmland, animal agriculture produces what percents of total calories?
    18% (Joseph Poore Oxford Study 2018)
  • In using 83% of the global farmland, animal agriculture produces what percent of protein calories?
    37% (Joseph Poore Oxford Study 2018)
  • Animal agriculture uses ____ of global farmland while producing only ___ of total calories and ___ of calories from protein.
    Animal agriculture uses 83% of global farmland while producing only 18% of total calories and 37% of calories from protein. (Joseph Poore Oxford Study 2018)
  • Only ___ of farmland is used to grow food for human consumption, yet produces ___ of total calories and ___ of calories from protein
    Only 17% of farmland is used to grow food for human consumption, yet produces 82% of total calories and 63% of calories from protein (Joseph Poore Oxford Study 2018) [logical converse]
  • Calorie Conversion: On average, how many calories of plant feed does it take to produce one calorie of food from animals?
    24. (World Resources Institute)
  • Feed Conversion by weight: How many pounds of feed does it take to product on pound of food made from animal flesh and secretions?
    7. (World Resources Institute)
  • Why do feed conversion ratios based on pounds understate the inefficiency of animal agriculture?
    Because they “improperly compares the weight of a relatively wet output [meat, dairy, and eggs] to the weight of a relatively dry input [feed grains]” (World Resources Institute). Calorie conversion ratios are a more accurate measure.
  • According to a University of Minnesota study, what percentage of crops fed to animals contribute to the human diet as meat and other animal products?
    12%
  • If everyone in the world were to adopt a Western-style diet high in meat and dairy, how many earths would be required to provide enough pastureland and cropland to feed the livestock?
    4. (Nature journal)
  • What did Phillip Wollen, a philanthropist and a former Vice-President of Citibank, observe in his travels?
    “as I travel around the world I see poor countries sell their grain to the west while their own children die in their arms.”
  • What two authors have claimed that 80% or more of the world’s hungry and starving children live in countries where feed is feed to animals that will be eaten by people in more affluent countries?
    Jeremy Rifkin and Dr. Richard Oppenlander.
  • What counterclaims are addressed in the briefing?
    1. We already produce enough to feed everyone.

    2. 86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans.

    3. Increased grazing, particularly holistic, regenerative grazing, can help with the problem because grazed animals do not require feed.

    4. As there are starving people, we should put them first over non-human animals (tangential).

    5. It would be impossible or difficult for people in some cultures to give up animal products because of a lack of alternatives.(tangential).
  • Why does that fact that we already produce enough to feed everyone not negate the claim that veganism can mitigate the problem?
    It seems naive to think that the ability to feed billions more with a plant-based food economy would not help because some of that additional food would likely reach the hungry and starving.

    Also, a rising human population from 8 billion in 2022 to a projected 10 billion in 2058 should require at least a proportionate 25% increase in food production, suggesting we might not be able to feed everyone forever.
  • What can be said of the claim that 80% or more of the world’s hungry and starving children live in countries where feed is feed to animals that will be eaten by people in more affluent countries?
    It seems almost criminal that starving and hungry people, be they children or adults, do not have access to food grown locally—food that is instead used to support the animal agriculture industry.
  • How does the benefits of eliminating supply chain food waste compare to the benefits of replacing animal-based food with plant-based food?
    “The benefits of replacing animal-based food with plant-based food are well above the expected benefits of eliminating all supply chain food waste [which includes logistics], according to an analysis of opportunity costs.”

    (a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by two environmental scientists, a physicist, and a molecular biologist)
  • What is one reason there may be less waste with plant-based foods?
    In general, because they can be stored longer and refrigeration is less important (particularly nuts, grains, and seeds).
  • What study stated that “86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans.”
    No study. That was a misquote by Sacred Cow and possibly others.

    The Science Direct analysis instead says “86% is made of materials that are currently not eaten by humans,” not materials that humans cannot eat.
  • Why is the distinction between materials that are “not eaten by humans” and those that are inherently “inedible” important ?
    If the calculation of the percentage of feed that was inedible by humans was based on the inherent edibility of feed materials, the percentage of non-edible feed could differ significantly from the 86% figure.
  • In stating that “86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans,” why is that fact that the “86% figure is based on feed weight, not calories, important?
    If the analysis was by calories the 86% figure would be considerably lower as the non-edible portion of animal feed is typically composed of materials such as crop residues, food waste, and by-products from food processing, which are generally lower in caloric content compared to edible feed sources such as grains and legumes.
  • Other than claim that “86% of the global livestock feed intake is made of materials that are inedible by humans.” being a misquote, and the fact that the actual quote is based on the weight of the feed and not the calories, what other facts are pertinent?
    The 86% claim, even if true, would not change the findings that:1. Over 75% of the world’s grains and soy used for food are fed to animals.2. With plant-based foods we could feed an additional 3.5 billion globally and another 400 million in the US.3. Livestock are highly inefficient at converting feed into meat.4. Much of the land used to grow silage and fodder crops (such as corn, barley, and alfalfa) for feed could also be used to grow crops for human consumption5. It takes on average 24 calories of plant feed to produce one calorie of food from animals.
  • What are some problems with the idea that grazing can help with the problem because grazed animals do not required feed.
    1. We simply don’t have enough land—the US has enough pasture to support only 27% of the current beef production.” (Environmental Research Letters)

    2. Grazed animals are often fed grains even while grazing and then moved to a feedlot to be fed grains for 4 to 6 months of their 18-month existence before being slaughtered.
  • What could be said of the tangentially related claim that as there are starving people, we should put them first over non-human animals?
    1. You can feed far more with a plant-based food economy, so this point is moot.

    2. Even if you could not feed more people with plants, it’s possible to care about and act on more than one problem.
  • What could be said of the tangentially related claim that it would be impossible or difficult for people in some cultures to give up animal products because of a lack of alternatives.
    1. This is true, but irrelevant to most of the people reading this.

    2. It would be disingenuous for someone to proclaim, for example, that because goat herders in Afghanistan can’t do it, they are not even going to consider it.
  • What area currently has the greatest number of undernourished, and how is this expected to change.
    While Asia currently has the greatest number of undernourished (381 million), by 2030 it is expected that Africa will have the most. (United Nations)
  • Name 3 ways this topic is relevant to animal rights and veganism?
    1. It is not unusual for someone to dismiss veganism by stating that as long as there are starving people, we should put them first over non-human animals.

    2. The ability of veganism to have a positive impact on world hunger is often overlooked as one of the merits of veganism, yet perhaps should be included alongside animal ethics, the environment, and other public and personal human health issues.

    3. Some industry sources have at least implied that animal agriculture is necessary for producing enough food for everyone.
  • Where can you find full citations and the written briefing titled “Can Veganism Mitigate Hunger and Starvations?”
    vbriefings.org/hunger
Advocacy Notes
Tips for Advocacy and Outreach

Don’t say that animal agriculture causes hunger but that “veganism promotes a more efficient food system better capable of feeding the world’s starving, hungry, and impoverished” or “the opportunity cost of animal agriculture contributes to hunger.”

When discussing this topic, it’s likely the interlocutor will bring up the first counterclaim addressed on this page—that we already produce enough to feed everyone. So it would be a good idea to familiarize yourself with our suggested response.

Remember that when discussing this topic you don’t have to remember all the points made here and the exact source for them. You can always refer your interlocutor to this page.

How this topic is relevant to Animal Rights and Veganism

It is not unusual for someone to dismiss veganism by stating that as long as there are starving people, we should put them first over non-human animals.

The ability of veganism to have a positive impact on world hunger is often overlooked as one of the merits of veganism, yet perhaps should be included alongside animal ethics, the environment, and other public and personal human health issues.

Some industry sources42 43have at least implied that animal agriculture is necessary for producing enough food for everyone, yet the evidence as shown herein contradicts this notion.

Footnotes

Our sources, with links back to where they’re used.

  1. 10 Facts About Child Hunger in The World. UN World Food Program, July 2022 ↩︎
  2. In world of wealth, 9 million people die every year from hunger. UN World Food Program, September 2021 ↩︎
  3. 10 Facts About Child Hunger in The World. UN World Food Program, July 2022 ↩︎
  4. United Nations, World Population Prospects 2022 ↩︎
  5. Without Clearing Any New Farmland, We Could Feed Two Earths’ Worth of People, Bloomberg (analysis), December 15, 2020 ↩︎
  6. “6 Causes of World Hunger – Why There Is Global Food Insecurity.” UN World Food Program ↩︎
  7. The IAASTD Report—Agriculture at a Crossroads.” United Nations Environment Program, 2008. ↩︎
  8. U.S. Could Feed 800 Million People with Grain That Livestock Eat, Cornell Ecologist Advises Animal Scientists.” Cornell Chronicle, February 5, 2022. ↩︎
  9. Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare, Environmental Research Letters, 2013 ↩︎
  10. “Population Clock.” Archive.org, 2023, web.archive.org/web/20231201232905/www.census.gov/popclock/. Accessed 5 Dec. 2023.
    ↩︎
  11. Shepon, Alon, Gidon Eshel, Elad Noor, and Ron Milo. “The Opportunity Cost of Animal Based Diets Exceeds All Food Losses.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 15 (April 10, 2018): 3804–9. ↩︎
  12. Food Outlook. United Nations FAO. November 2022 ↩︎
  13. Soy, Our World in Data. Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser. 2020 ↩︎
  14. Yao ZD, Cao YN, Peng LX, Yan ZY, Zhao G. Coarse Cereals and Legume Grains Exert Beneficial Effects through Their Interaction with Gut Microbiota: A Review. J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Jan 27;69(3):861-877. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05691. Epub 2020 Dec 2. PMID: 33264009. ↩︎
  15. Sweet corn and field corn, what are the differences?, Michigan State University Extension, 2013. ↩︎
  16. Global Maize Production, Utilization, and Consumption, NY Academy of Sciences, 2015. ↩︎
  17. Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed, IntechOpen Online Report, 2020 ↩︎
  18. James Rowe and John Nolan, Energy Requirements of Livestock. The Theory and Practice of Animal Nutrition, Applied Animal Nutrition Journal 2009 ↩︎
  19. Carrington, Damian, and Damian Carrington Environment editor. “Avoiding Meat and Dairy Is ‘Single Biggest Way’ to Reduce Your Impact on Earth.” The Guardian, May 31, 2018, sec. Environment ↩︎
  20. Poore, J., and T. Nemecek. “Reducing Food’s Environmental Impacts through Producers and Consumers.” Science 360, no. 6392 (June 2018): 987–92. ↩︎
  21. An average of the figures for various farmed animals from this study on page 37 figure 2: World Resources Institute. “Creating a Sustainable Food Future.” World Resources Institute, 2013-2014 ↩︎
  22. Creating a Sustainable Food Future: Interim Findings | World Resources Institute, PDF.” December 2, 2013. ↩︎
  23. Redefining Agricultural Yields: From Tonnes to People Nourished per Hectare – IOPscience,” August 13, 2013. ↩︎
  24. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. ↩︎
  25. Philip Wollen : Animals Should Be Off The Menu, May 16, 2012. ↩︎
  26. Jeremy Rifkin. The World’s Problems on a Plate. The Guardian. 2002 ↩︎
  27. Dr. Richard Oppenlander. “Comfortably Unaware :: The World Hunger-Food Choice Connection: A Summary,” April 22, 2012. ↩︎
  28. Without Clearing Any New Farmland, We Could Feed Two Earths’ Worth of People, Bloomberg (analysis), December 15, 2020 ↩︎
  29. “6 Causes of World Hunger – Why There Is Global Food Insecurity.” UN World Food Program ↩︎
  30. “The IAASTD Report—Agriculture at a Crossroads.” United Nations Environment Program, 2008. ↩︎
  31. U.S. Could Feed 800 Million People with Grain That Livestock Eat, Cornell Ecologist Advises Animal Scientists.” Cornell Chronicle, February 5, 2022. ↩︎
  32. United Nations, World Population Prospects 2022 ↩︎
  33. Shepon, Alon, Gidon Eshel, Elad Noor, and Ron Milo. “The Opportunity Cost of Animal Based Diets Exceeds All Food Losses.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 15 (April 10, 2018): 3804–9. ↩︎
  34. Sacred Cow. “Only a Small % of What Cattle Eat Is Grain. 86% Comes from Materials Humans Don’t Eat.,” September 10, 2019. ↩︎
  35. Anne Mottet, Cees de Haan, Alessandra Falcucci, Giuseppe Tempio, Carolyn Opio, Pierre Gerber, Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate, Global Food Security, Volume 14, 2017, Pages 1-8, ISSN 2211-9124. ↩︎
  36. Comparison of Farming in Production of Food Per Acre, Humane Party Analysis using USDA and UN FAO data ↩︎
  37. Hayek, Matthew N, and Rachael D Garrett. “Nationwide Shift to Grass-Fed Beef Requires Larger Cattle Population.” Environmental Research Letters 13, no. 8 (July 25, 2018): 084005. ↩︎
  38. Age of Animals Slaughtered.” Farm Transparency Project, November 11, 2020. ↩︎
  39. Corn-Fed Versus Grass-Fed Beef Fact Sheet.” North American Meat Institute, January 2015. ↩︎
  40. UN report sends ‘sobering message’ of deeply entrenched hunger globally. UN News. July 13, 2020. ↩︎
  41. UN report sends ‘sobering message’ of deeply entrenched hunger globally. UN News. July 13, 2020. ↩︎
  42. The Value and Importance of Animal Agriculture. Dairy Business Magazine. June 12, 2020. ↩︎
  43. Lawrence P Reynolds, Meghan C Wulster-Radcliffe, Debra K Aaron, Teresa A Davis, Importance of Animals in Agricultural Sustainability and Food SecurityThe Journal of Nutrition, Volume 145, Issue 7, July 2015, Pages 1377–1379 ↩︎

Under Construction

I get it. Let me in.